Total budget
Unavailable
Not cleared for display or not loaded
Coordination workspacePublic data
Governance command view
One decision surface for Uttarakhand’s departmental allocations, district signals and active public warnings—with the scope and source of every figure kept visible.
State context: 1,19,93,000 residents in the latest population figure held by the platform.
Public preview
Officer authentication is planned but not active. This workspace currently arranges public budget documents, public indicators and public warning feeds; it does not expose restricted operational data.
State snapshot
Decision context at a glance
Budget estimates are allocations, not spend
Capital allocation
Unavailable
Voted and charged capital provision
District evidence
13 districts
11 comparable indicators
Warnings in force
0
0 lapsed in the last 48 hours
Evidence queue
Districts with the most lower-half signals
A triage list for follow-up questions, not an official performance rating.
- 1
Rudraprayag
9/11 lower-half signals
Lowest signal: Women's Dairy Cooperative Societies · 60 · rank 13/13
- 2
Bageshwar
8/11 lower-half signals
Lowest signal: Dharamshala and Ashram Capacity · 15 · rank 13/13
- 3
Uttarkashi
8/11 lower-half signals
Lowest signal: Dairy Cooperative Societies · 55 · rank 12/13
- 4
Champawat
7/11 lower-half signals
Lowest signal: Beds in Hotels and Homestays · 1,678 · rank 13/13
- 5
Udham Singh Nagar
7/11 lower-half signals
Lowest signal: Literacy Rate · 73.1% · rank 13/13
Live feed
Warnings in force
No warnings currently in force.
The feed was checked successfully. Continue to monitor the dedicated alerts page.
Rudraprayag currently appears first in the evidence queue with 9 lower-half signals.
Public finance
Budget explorer
Compare nineteen official budget estimates, then inspect demand-wise provisions where the source publishes a compatible table. Allocations are not actual expenditure.
Total budget estimate
₹15,451.95 cr
Revenue expenditure
₹11,996.69 cr
Capital expenditure
₹3,455.26 cr
Total receipts
₹14,821.67 cr
Historical budget estimates
Current-year budget estimate from each annual document; amounts in crore.
| Year | Revenue | Capital | Total outlay | Year change | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | ₹8,662.53 cr | ₹3,778.79 cr | ₹12,441.32 cr | — | State summary |
| 2009-10 | ₹11,161.11 cr | ₹3,576.27 cr | ₹14,737.38 cr | +18.5% | State summary |
| 2010-11 | ₹11,996.69 cr | ₹3,455.26 cr | ₹15,451.95 cr | +4.8% | State summary |
| 2011-12 | ₹14,325.69 cr | ₹5,041.22 cr | ₹19,366.91 cr | +25.3% | State summary |
| 2012-13 | ₹15,717.11 cr | ₹6,214.66 cr | ₹21,931.77 cr | +13.2% | State summary |
| 2013-14 | ₹18,054.2 cr | ₹7,275.64 cr | ₹25,329.84 cr | +15.5% | State summary |
| 2014-15 | ₹23,792.03 cr | ₹6,561.75 cr | ₹30,353.78 cr | +19.8% | State summary |
| 2015-16 | ₹25,739.33 cr | ₹6,954.31 cr | ₹32,693.64 cr | +7.7% | State summary |
| 2016-17 | ₹32,250.39 cr | ₹8,171.81 cr | ₹40,422.2 cr | +23.6% | State summary |
| 2017-18 | ₹31,550.83 cr | ₹8,406.96 cr | ₹39,957.79 cr | -1.1% | State summary |
| 2018-19 | ₹35,627.31 cr | ₹9,957.78 cr | ₹45,585.09 cr | +14.1% | Summary + 31 demands |
| 2019-20 | ₹38,932.7 cr | ₹9,731.2 cr | ₹48,663.9 cr | +6.8% | Summary + 31 demands |
| 2020-21 | ₹42,389.67 cr | ₹11,137.3 cr | ₹53,526.97 cr | +10.0% | Summary + 31 demands |
| 2021-22 | ₹44,036.31 cr | ₹13,364.01 cr | ₹57,400.32 cr | +7.2% | Summary + 31 demands |
| 2022-23 | ₹49,013.31 cr | ₹16,558.18 cr | ₹65,571.49 cr | +14.2% | Summary + 31 demands |
| 2023-24 | ₹52,747.71 cr | ₹24,659.37 cr | ₹77,407.08 cr | +18.0% | Summary + 31 demands |
| 2024-25 | ₹55,815.77 cr | ₹33,414.3 cr | ₹89,230.07 cr | +15.3% | Summary + 31 demands |
| 2025-26 | ₹59,954.65 cr | ₹41,220.68 cr | ₹1,01,175.33 cr | +13.4% | Summary + 31 demands |
| 2026-27 | ₹64,989.44 cr | ₹46,713.77 cr | ₹1,11,703.21 cr | +10.4% | Summary + 31 demands |
State summary available
The 2010-11 Budget at a Glance uses an older presentation and does not provide the comparable 31-demand table used below for 2018-19 onward. No departmental values have been inferred.
Open the 2010-11 source PDFDistrict evidence
Comparable strengths and gaps
Rankings use one published vintage per indicator and only include indicators that cover all 13 districts and declare whether higher or lower is preferable.
Indicator benchmark matrix
“Leading” means rank 1 after applying the indicator’s stated direction. It does not always mean the numerically largest value.
| Indicator | Leading district | Trailing district | Vintage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dairy Cooperative Societies | Nainital(577) | Rudraprayag(40) | 31/03/2022 |
| Beds in Government Rest Houses | Chamoli(1,852) | Udham Singh Nagar(156) | 31/03/2022 |
| Literacy Rate | Dehradun(84.3%) | Udham Singh Nagar(73.1%) | 01/03/2011 |
| Average Daily Milk Production | Nainital(94,833 kg/day) | Rudraprayag(243 kg/day) | 31/03/2022 |
| Per-Capita Income | Haridwar(₹3,62,688) | Rudraprayag(₹93,160) | 31/03/2022 |
| Dharamshala and Ashram Capacity | Haridwar(96,750) | Bageshwar(15) | 31/03/2022 |
| SDG Composite Rank | Bageshwar(#1) | Haridwar(#9) | 31/03/2021 |
| SDG Composite Score | Bageshwar(69) | Haridwar(53) | 31/03/2021 |
| Beds in Hotels and Homestays | Nainital(47,656) | Champawat(1,678) | 31/03/2022 |
| Hotels, Lodges and Homestays | Dehradun(1,376) | Champawat & Udham Singh Nagar(131) | 31/03/2022 |
| Women's Dairy Cooperative Societies | Nainital(132) | Rudraprayag(60) | 31/03/2022 |
Coverage boundary: 11 indicators are fully comparable. 7 additional indicators are excluded from ranking because they are descriptive or do not cover every district.
- Hospital Beds · partial coverage
- Inhabited Villages · context only
- Population · context only
- Schools · partial coverage
- Sex Ratio · context only
- Share of Villages Under 200 People · context only
- Villages Under 200 People · context only
Spatial view
Districts and warning extent
Boundaries provide geographic context. A shaded district can represent an area named by a warning, not necessarily the authority’s exact hazard footprint.
Loading map…
Read rankings as prompts for investigation
Lower-half placement means only that a district ranks below other Uttarakhand districts on a published figure of the vintage shown. Several datasets are older, and available district data is uneven across sectors. No composite score or policy recommendation is invented where the evidence does not support one.